Please describe your proposed solution.
Following the Beirut blast, international aid flooded into the country to provide humanitarian relief. Many surveys were conducted in affected areas to compensate victims and help rebuild the destruction, however the execution of the funding was left to the local community. Given the lack of oversight and transparency, an influx of NGOs popped out of the blue to get a share of the donations yet quickly disappeared after providing little-to-no benefits. Of the significant amounts of funds received the money distributed to locals was minimal. Moreover, food and other donated goods were found on supermarket shelves and in stores being sold. Our solution was born from experiencing this real life event.
Canadian Case Study - inflation consequences
Problem
Many NGOs use exorbitantly expensive Web 2.0 proprietary softwares that achieve varying and often limited success in reaching donors, driving event attendance, increasing digital engagement or inspiring new volunteers. (e.g Almabase) This approach not only reduces the success of the NGOs by limiting their ability to deliver the essential services they provide, it also breeds a lack of trust among individuals or entities looking to donate. We believe that we can build a better platform with the help of the Cardano Blockchain to mitigate or remove some of the major obstacles that exist in the current NGO and giving sector.
Solution
We propose to build a Dapp that bridges the gap between donors and NGOs through the Cardano blockchain (called Cardano NGO = CNGO). Not only will our project bring value to the Cardano community, it will widen the whole ecosystem by transforming donors-NGOs softwares to a user-friendly blockchain-based web-page to improve end-user experience: the beneficiaries of the NGOs.
Our solution will connect donors to the NGOs via our platform on the Cardano blockchain, where all transactions are traceable and transparent. The impact will be global because donors have the ability to choose which cause, SDG (Sustainable Development Goals), or specific NGO to support and will also be exposed to a wider array of NGOs that support their preferred cause. Each listed NGO will have its pool where all donations are to be stored. Donor funds will be transferred progressively to the NGOs based on two main indicators; the NGOs’ needs for the target cause/SDG and the NGO’s evidence of expenditures. The blockchain technology allows the process to be transparent and ensures it can’t be edited or deleted.
Some of the expected benefits of our platform include:
- Fiscal operations between donors & the NGOs will be immediate with low transaction fees.
- Donors will have accessibility and traceability of their donations
- Any misbehavior or suspicious acts by NGOs are easily reportable
- The impact is universal and any donor can choose to donate to any NGO in the world.
- Traceability of funds is not public data. Donors will have the ability to choose to publicize or privatize the visibility and traceability of their funds.
Please describe how your proposed solution will address the Challenge that you have submitted it in.
Our proposal fits into the Dapps, Products, and Integrations challenge because we are delivering a web-based Dapp that will link NGOs, Donors, and Recipients on Cardano. In addition, we believe our solution may also have a potential positive impact on Nation Governance Systems due to the security and centralization challenges currently facing existing services.
What are the main risks that could prevent you from delivering the project successfully and please explain how you will mitigate each risk?
As our focus is not solely on the people within Cardano, but people outside the blockchain as well and how to onboard them, the challenges we might face along the way to create a platform that connects donors to NGOs in a transparent way are the following:
Risk 1: Some NGOs won’t believe in the efficiency of blockchain or don't have enough knowledge/information about blockchains, investing the time to educate individuals about the blockchain
**Mitigation 1:**The mentioned challenges above lie in the decentralized nature of the project, therefore we need to approach NGOs professionally and prove to them that the blockchain can help them restore donors’ trust, along with making the process of receiving payments easier and much faster.
Risk 2: Some NGOs might refuse to be transparent, they might not be willing to cooperate with our transparency rules
Mitigation 2: The NGOs that won’t cooperate with our transparency rules and are not willing to provide proof of expenditures will be voted out or banned (delisted and put in the “banned NGOs” section). Corrupt NGOs will eliminate themselves by default before being listed as they have to be transparent and therefore will no longer have the possibility to mismanage the funds.
Risk 3: Rallying NGOs supporting a variety of causes that the community is interested in donating to in each country (animal rescue, kids rights, women rights, food programs, LGBTQ+, environmental, Red Cross…)
Mitigation 3: Build a strategic plan focusing on various countries along with relevant SDGs.