Please describe your proposed solution
Photrek will develop legal solutions for the management of decentralized organizations which creates mechanisms for the owners, workers, and public to contribute to an organizations' strategic decision-making. Photrek will review the benefits corporation legal frameworks [1], [2] to determine the appropriate structure for forming a sociocratic board of directors whose members are composed of investing partners via an investors circle, working partners via sociocratic representation, and the public via a plural voting election. The purpose of this structure is to improve the ability of the organization to make effective decisions that steer working partners toward contributing their peak capabilities.
Sociocracy [3], [4], [5], diagrammed in Figure 1, is an organizational method based on circle members deliberating strategy and policy solutions until they arrive at a consent decision. The solutions then become the basis for running an efficient system that builds measurably stronger teamwork among participants [6]. In contrast to consensus, there are no votes, rather reasoned objections are reviewed and resolved until good-enough-for-now solutions are determined with time limits and opportunities for correcting course. Circles are interlinked via a leader appointed by a parent circle who is responsible for the circles’ aim and a delegate representative selected by the subcircle who is responsible for reporting on progress to the parent circle. The double-linking provides feedback loops in which independent measurements of performance guide future decisions. Through a combination of strategic consent and tactical autonomy, the organization can achieve effective results while assuring dispersed decision-making.
The legal challenge is that for-profit legislation is focused on making the owners of an organization the exclusive decision-makers for strategic, board-level policies. Gerard Endenburg, the Netherlands entrepreneur who invented sociocracy, overcame these shortcomings, by creating a separate non-profit foundation that held the majority shares of the for-profit organization. In recent years, the introduction of benefits corporations open the possibility of creating a for-profit sociocratic organization following the regulations of public benefit. Photrek will examine several benefits corporation jurisdictions and evaluate their relative receptivity to applying sociocratic principles to the management of a decentralized organization.
[1] S. Munch, “Improving the benefit corporation: How traditional governance mechanisms can enhance the innovative new business form,” Nw. JL & Soc. Pol’y, vol. 7, p. 170, 2012.
[2] R. K. Mitchell, G. R. Weaver, B. R. Agle, A. D. Bailey, and J. Carlson, “Stakeholder Agency and Social Welfare: Pluralism and Decision Making in the Multi-Objective Corporation,” AMR, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 252–275, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.5465/amr.2013.0486.
[3] J. A. Buck and S. Villines, We the People: Consenting to a Deeper Democracy. Sociocracy.Info Press, 2017. Accessed: Jul. 11, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.amazon.com/We-People-Consenting-Deeper-Democracy/dp/0979282705
[4] J. A. Buck and G. Endenburg, “The creative forces of self-organization,” Sociocratic Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Tech. Rep, 2012, Accessed: Apr. 07, 2024. [Online]. Available: http://www.habitatreimagined.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Creative-Forces-of-Self-Organization1-4.pdf
[5] K. Nelson, E. Hansen, N. Battle, S. Macurdy, and N. Tran, “Sociocratic Pluralism governance for blockchain ecosystems,” Jul. 30, 2024, Rochester, NY: 4911180. Accessed: Aug. 07, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4911180
[6] A. Bauernfeind, “Measuring instrument - data prove effectiveness,” Institute for Participatory Social Research, Apr. 2021. Accessed: Oct. 15, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.printfriendly.com/p/g/Xh8XDu