Please describe your proposed solution.
We will revitalize the Cardano project by launching a campaign for Cardano products, primarily targeting the Japanese market. We will also establish prizes for participants in Dapps and other initiatives. Our main focus will be on attracting Metamask users, new Web3 users, and ADA holders who are currently not actively using Dapps.
In Japan, there are key players in Cardano products, including dcSpark (+Paima, Milkomeda), Socious, and Zengate. Additionally, there are several Catalyst projects utilizing Cardano. Furthermore, a popular magazine company plans to launch a magazine featuring favorable articles about Cardano in February or March next year. Given the current situation, we plan to run a campaign focused on promoting products from Japanese companies and organizations. This campaign will include game contests with prizes, PR contests, and giveaways for users who have started using thier services. Additionally, we will offer small sponsorships to magazine companies and encourage them to engage in PR activities. Furthermore, we will organize small-scale on-site trial sessions.
At present, our campaign targets Paima-based games, Socious's escrow system, and NFT projects in Japan. We have chosen to focus on Japan because it allows for stricter management of legal and regulatory issues, as well as the ability to have direct communication and long-term collaboration with project managers. Even in overseas infrastructure projects, if the project can secure long-term credit, there is a possibility of providing support, even if the funds are divided to some extent.
Background
What are the representative services offered by Cardano? This question holds great importance for Cardano in its current state. Naturally, the appeal lies in high-security staking that doesn't require locking funds. It is believed that Midnight and AtalaPRISM will emerge as notable names in the future. However, the number of Cardano wallets holding 100 ADA or more is relatively small, around 1.1 million, compared to Ethereum addresses with a similar value. This issue is not unique to Cardano, but the compatibility problem with Metamask is worth noting.
The proposer has used both Cardano's Dapps wallet and Metamask and has observed advantages and disadvantages with each. Cardano wallets are user-friendly for security, staking, and simple swapping. On the other hand, Metamask provides an excellent interface for complex operations and generating multiple transactions quickly. At the same time, there is a sense that understanding Cardano's Multi Asset Transaction concept may be challenging for those accustomed to Metamask.
However, overall, the difference lies in the operability between Windows and Macintosh. However, for new entrants, the most important factor is the expected profit based on the number of active users. To acquire new Cardano adopters, it is necessary to increase the number of active Cardano wallets and promote the availability of Metamask compatible services and cross-chain services, such as Milkomeda, to both users and companies. It is preferable to first promote the number of active users, followed by promoting it to the users.
On the other hand, Japan, known for its stringent security measures, was the first country to hold the ADA pre-sale, which resulted in the accumulation of many ADA whale holders in Japan. The legal regulations regarding crypto assets in Japan are also clear. While there may be some inconveniences, services developed in accordance with Japanese standards will not be abruptly banned. Currently, there is a global trend towards regulating crypto assets. Japan has had strict laws in place since the Coincheck XEM theft incident in 2018. Although this has hindered the emergence of Web3 companies, we can look forward to the future. As a result of policy changes, we are beginning to see some relaxation of the law. Under these circumstances, activities by Web3 companies that are already established in Japan or companies that have formed partnerships with Web3 companies are becoming more active.
Under these circumstances, we would like to attract investors to Japanese companies. However, we are uncertain about the extent to which we can expect investors to invest in specific companies within Cardano, a decentralized system. There is a problem. Additionally, there are differences in the technical direction of sidechains, including Milkomeda and Cardano itself. Nevertheless, in terms of increasing Cardano's popularity and allowing users to gradually gain experience with Cardano wallets, product PR, even if it is based on Milkomeda, will be beneficial for Cardano. We also believe that the activation of WADA and mADA will have a positive impact on Cardano as a whole. From this perspective, we propose promoting Cardano projects based in Japan, as there is a low risk of failure due to legal regulations.