Please describe your proposed solution.
Opportunity to classify and automate individual parts of business to achieve a streamlined rapidly scalability and simplified model without forfeiting quality of service.
Providing the structure for technical, organisational, and economical systems of the DAO.
Development of the first product and services DAO on the Cardano blockchain. Committed to supplying commodities beneficial to Cardano stakeholders through decentralised operations on the blockchain.
Development of a DAO which allows the opportunity for all to fairly contribute through equality of governance paired with skills based governance. Incentivised through rewards for participation and voting.
Please describe how your proposed solution will address the Challenge that you have submitted it in.
The proposal challenge aims to support global communities onboarding DAO’s to the Cardano ecosystem. This project aims to use the functionality of a DAO for Operations, Governance and community collaboration.
DAO categories addressing the proposal challenge
- Governance - Voting - Voting Power - Engagement to vote
- Dapps and Smart contracts
- Treasury - permissions
- Network upgrades
- Risk Assessment
- Web3
DAO Governance - 2 Method Voting System
A two-method voting approach will be deployed over time, allowing the DAO to grow at a natural rate and avoiding governance attacks. This governance approach enables everyday users to vote on proposals where general knowledge is sufficient to cast an informed vote. For technical aspects of proposals, voters would be required to register their qualifications to participate.
The two methods of voting are as follows.
1. Everyday users are encouraged to vote on projects that focus on, community growth such as; project locations, community activities and hub related activities. Where to focus education (what particular health or climate benefits should be focused upon), what target audiences should be engaged. Etc
2. While the second method of governance voting, focuses on technical and scientific aspects of the projects. This requires voters to be certified scientists and/or engineers with a specific knowledge of the areas to be voted upon. Applicants will be interviewed to ensure they hold the relevant qualifications. These interviews will confirm applicants are knowledgeable and capable of casting an informed vote.
Risk Management
The project is initially engineer and scientist lead, over time community voting will be enabled, allowing the project to morph into a DAO at a sustainable and manageable rate. System changes must be carefully implemented to avoid risks while maintaining quality products and a high level of technical skill and operations.
Incentives
The community will be incentivized with tokens rewards to encourage voting.
This proposal aims to identify the correct voting methodologies for fair voting which incentivise and reward participants.
Dapps, Smart contracts and Web3
Integration of blockchain technologies will integrate financial, logistical and other internal system functionality, such as; Supply Chain Tracking and Quality Assurance.
Web3 will allow token holders to interact with Dapps on the website, such as purchasing products, placing orders and voting governance.
What are the main risks that could prevent you from delivering the project successfully and please explain how you will mitigate each risk?
Currently risks involve the dependence on off-chain governance, external software or social media platforms. This risk will be improved by smart contract integration and Web3 technology, enabling people to vote via the website.
There is a risk of governance exploitations, to avoid exploitations comprehensive testing will be applied to all new voting methodologies and smart contract integrations. All implemented technologies (Web3, API’s Smart Contract and Dapps) will be rigorously tested prior to implementation.
A risk of rushed implementation, to overcome this, all governance and smart contract applications will be thoroughly tested prior to user engagement.
There is a risk of low community engagement in governance voting, this will be overcome with effective incentives which provide rewards for voting.