Why should your NFTs or digital assets only be available to show on the blockchain you had originally brought them on?
Simply put, and utilising web3 and multiverses, it's simple to be able to show a digital version of your assets across multiple chains in the same way as it is currently possible to share JPEGs, PNGs and other media files on web2.
What Checkpoint will do is allow the creation of a "multiverse traveler" that is customised to your specification - in the same way as you'd customise your videogame character in an RPG videogame, or a D&D character.
Like in current, what I like to call web2 multiverses, offerings such as Roblox or Minecraft - where your character traverses multiverses, but your character is always the same. As are your accessories and the "loot" you bring with you. This way, no matter what chain someone has been created on, they're able to interact and add value to other chains they're visiting or come across.
All Checkpoint’s content is free for everyone and, as such, should be accessible by anyone on any blockchain. All blockchains should work seamlessly together.
Checkpoint encourages the audience to become active participants by offering multiple ways in which to engage with the brand - one of those ways is by utilising Engage to Earn.
By allowing users to access their digital assets (including NFTs) and displaying and sharing them, Checkpoint proposes to use the integrated wallets as a platform to seamlessly share content across different blockchains.
The wallet would be able to choose whichever main net and display that asset across whichever blockchains it supports. Multiple wallets with differing blockchains increases exposure. But as cross-chain becomes more adopted, this will be expected from users.
Simply put, cross-chain compatibility. There are ways around this; one could be the use of already existing minting and marketplace platforms to allow you to mint multiple versions of the same asset (for example, you could buy an NFT on the Cardano blockchain from your marketplace, but that purchase also gives you access to other blockchain versions*), two exchanges would be able to talk to each other to create a version - linked to the ledger - of the asset.
*The real issue for this model is varying gas fees and carbon offsetting commitments on different blockchains. This would then impact the original cost price as minting on different blockchains would cost more.