Please describe your proposed solution.
This proposal aims to carry out crucial research in two folds to reach the objectives: namely, phase 1 and phase 2 outlined below.
Phase 1
Researching their current users/proposers enquiring about the process, what worked well, what they would improve
Use phase 1 to inform Phase 2 research on a niche area - how can more African people in the ecosystem be encouraged to apply for CLAP projects
Phase 3
Engaging workshops and new content with potential African proposers all about the Cardashift system and how they can apply with proposals that can make a difference!
NB: We are aware that there is an African challenge however, if one reads this CLAP challenge brief in full, it is still relevant for us to apply this research within this remit.
Please describe how your proposed solution will address the Challenge that you have submitted it in.
The two phase approach to our proposed solution will help to tackle the lack of financial attractiveness of impact projects in impact ecosystem with a focus of potential African proposers.
- Discovers innovative ways for impact-oriented projects to create financial value out of their impact generation, notably by issuing impact tokens: the third part of the proposed solution involves education potential African proposers on how best to make a Cardashift application based on phase 1's research. That is, interviewing those who have successfully been funded with CLAP for their projects.
- Increases transparency and traceability on the impact generated by a specific project - the best way to increase transparency on the impact generated by a specific project is to speak to those who have been successfully funded on the Cardashift platform.
Our proposed solution will address the 'impact valuation & monetisation' part of the challenge by interviewing those who have already been funded successfully on Cardashift with CLAP. This will help to identify the number of proof of concept trials that can be run with impact-oriented projects. By researching with the funded proposals, we can also identify how much financial value can be derived from impact-oriented projects. Furthermore, teams from funded projects alongside Cardashift team members will help us identify the time required to validate the impact value.
Additionally and in-relation to phase 3 of our proposed solution: we will create resources to help potential proposers understand the differences between 'impact-oriented solutions' and projects that only focus on 'Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) criteria' as there is a general misconception with 'social entrepreneurship' for this reason.
What are the main risks that could prevent you from delivering the project successfully and please explain how you will mitigate each risk?
The main risk would be access to the existing successful Cardashift proposers and their ability to liaise due to time constraints, however, we will communicate with the Cardashift team about the best way to approach this. For example, offering rewards (CLAP) for their time.
Additionally, from phase 1 of research, we will look into how best to encourage those from the African ecosystem to submit proposals on the Cardashift website, hence, we would have to simultaneously communicate with these people in question. To that end, this would be mitigated from our existing networks. For example, Daniel Lezu is a strong community member in the African Cardano ecosystem.