Please describe your proposed solution.
The pilot of Proof of Achievement in fund 9 saw several issues in the process of approval/rejection of proposals. Even though the process is a joint responsibility between challenge team and some Catalyst team members (Only the big challenge that contains big budget proposal of >75k), it is not uncommon that the 2 sides come up with different conclusions (Catalyst team decision supersedes the challenge team decision). Despite the challenge team communicates with the proposers frequently in their challenge, yet their voice is second and at times valid. Not to mention that the technical knowledge possess by both sides could be inadequate to handle ‘solo’ decision.
How does your proposed solution address the challenge and what benefits will this bring to the Cardano ecosystem?
· Transparency and accountability: The judgement and consensus reached by the reviewers are recorded on the blockchain, allowing for auditability and accountability. This is in contrast to the current process where the challenge team and Catalyst team arrive at different conclusions regarding the PoAs. The person in charge for PoAs are not identified but rather the decision is taken as a representative opinion of the group decision.
How do you intend to measure the success of your project?
· The number of projects receive their payment on time and not delay due to human error, labor shortage or the reviewer not understand the technicality of project: 250 (based on number of funded proposals in fund 9: 212 projects with the assumption of growing number of proposals between funds)
Please describe your plans to share the outputs and results of your project?
Bi-weekly: The project progress will be updated bi-weekly via twitter and telegram.
Monthly basis: We will provide monthly report and summary for each milestone progress on CardanoSpot and Cardano forum.