(https://youtu.be/oHivRmsOD_o?t=2508)

(4) After steps (1) to (3), the Catalyst Circle members present the prioritized problems back to the community with a call to action to propose solution-based proposals, initiatives and projects. This action is coordinated and supported by the Catalyst Circle and the CC Admin team.

• See problem presentations by the Catalyst Circle version 1 as an example ( Link to be added )

(B) Proposal Submission

1. The final prioritized Problems are presented to the community with the call to action for solution-based implementation proposals
2. To encourage effective collaboration, the Community has five days to build action teams to solve the problem.
3. The submitted solutions are reviewed in a 2-day timeframe by the community members that will act as CAs
4. The highest-ranked proposal assessments are reviewed by the vCAs within three days
5. The highest-ranked proposed solutions receive the needed funding to execute their proposals

Mechanism for dealing with multiple teams:

1. The final prioritized problems are presented to the Community. The Circle will document the issues on the CC - Trello or Jira board, and each case is "owned" by a Catalyst Circle - Member. The "Problem Owner" has to lead, coordinate and support the highest-ranked submitted proposal (5).
2. The Community has a 5 day timeframe to build action teams looking to provide an effective solution on the presented problem, to coordinate the available skill sets in the community and to create or to use networks that bring in the required missing skills.
3. The submitted solutions are reviewed in a 2-day timeframe from the catalyst community advisors, who will act as CAs out of the conventional CAs activity phase in the Project Catalyst - Assessment phase. The Catalyst Circle - Funding Mechanism allows us to explore new cases of evolution for the Community Advisors. It will enable us to gather a maximum of assessments on a low amount of proposals. This phase has to be well-coordinated from the Catalyst Circle. As we saw from the CA recruitment campaign in Fund 6, The CA, IOG and T&M representatives can initiate and coordinate very effective activities that require immediate community participation.
4. The highest-ranked proposal assessments are reviewed by the vCAs within three days after the CAs assessment phase of 2 days has passed.

<u>Team composition:</u>

Each team assigns a communicator.

By networking and open discussion a team or multiple teams can form.

Using the broader networks of the community external implementers can be added to the team.

(C) Auditing the proposals

The Catalyst Circle acts in different roles. As a funding body and a "Challenge Team," which stewards the overall activities of the funded proposals. Further, as an Audit Team, ensure the safe distribution of the funds in guidelines to the proposers KPIs/OKRs/Milestones and achievements or failures.

(1) The Catalyst Circle and the Catalyst Circle Admin team will document and track the execution of the funded proposals.

(2) The Catalyst Circle and the Catalyst Circle Admin team will report the overall progress and status of the funded proposals every week in the Project Catalyst Town Hall

(D) Fund & leftover balances

(1) If the Catalyst Circle does not allocate all funds by the end of their term, the next Catalyst Circle will have the discretion to use the leftover funds to support upcoming initiatives.

(2) The balance of the available and distributed funds will be transparently tracked and documented.

(E) Impact.

The Catalyst Circle version 2 addresses the Rapid funding mechanism challenge introduced by the Catalyst Circle version 1 through this proposal. The purpose of this proposal is to explore a funding mechanism that can distribute funds in a fast and safe manner to time-critical community initiatives and projects that offer a solution to a prioritized Catalyst Circle problem. This proposal aims to act as a pilot mechanism that other groups or projects can quickly adapt. This mechanism is highly scalable and intended to impact future funding models and mechanisms positively.

(F) Feasibility.

The Catalyst Circle and the Catalyst Circle Admin Team are highly engaged and experienced community members who can successfully implement the proposed Funding mechanism.

(G) Auditability.

As the proposed mechanism can repeat in fast iterations, we can adjust and improve the mechanism by staying flexible and dynamic to the situation and evolve this proposal over iterations. The Catalyst Circle and the Catalyst Circle Admin team will update the community at the Project Catalyst Town Hall weekly.

(H) Adjustability.

As the ecosystem and community are constantly growing and changing, we have designed this proposal to be a fast and easily repeatable mechanism. By its flexible and adjustable nature, we can be adaptable to emerging situations.

(I) Roadmap:

(1) Executing the first iteration of the Catalyst Circle - Funding Mechanism through Fund 8

(2) Documenting and auditing the Catalyst Circle - Funding Mechanism to provide a playbook that can evolve over further iterations

(3) Introducing the Catalyst Circle - Funding Mechanism to the next version of the Catalyst Circle with improvement suggestions based on the first iteration

(J) Budget Breakdown

As the Catalyst Circle represents several vital groups within the ecosystem, we will allocate an equal amount of funds to each of the designated community groups to finance one project that provides a solution to their community. Group allocated

(1) Community Advisors - 7000 USD

(2) Funded Proposers - 7000 USD

(3) General ADA Holder - 7000 USD

(4) Stake Pool Operators - 7000 USD

(5) Toolmakers & Maintainers - 7000 USD

(6) Unexpected costs - 2500 USD