Long description of the Problem
Many projects on the ERC-20 standard and on other chains have failed/not performed due to one or many of the following reasons
- rushing coins to market
- lack of integration between legacy registries and blockchain tokens
- unrealistically high yield, creating an inflationary asset
- lack of investor access, onboarding problems, no KYC/AML
- lack of price discovery mechanisms, purely speculative intrinsic value and high correlation to crypto prices
- no adequate market making to suit carbon, which behaves like an energy commodity and not like a currency or bond
- inadequate use of NFT for simplicity of the sake of using NFTs
- inadequate marketing, promising a get-rich-quick scheme that is “also green”
A “regenerative” carbon economy is not just an optimistic possibility, it is a necessity. As the Wikipedia article on Carbon Prices points out, an order-of-magnitude increase of carbon prices is necessary to achieve UN climate targets. However, the gold rush mentality of the day is not matched by significant breakthroughs. Here, we sense an enormous opportunity for Cardano – it is not our style to “fail fast” but instead hit home runs with rigorous research and doing things correctly, not necessary first.
Reference: Regenerative economy and existing blockchain solutions exists on ERC-20 standard
<u>https://klimadao.medium.com/klimadao-a-building-block-of-the-refi-economy-2124a443b043</u>
<u>https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/klimadao/</u>
Across a growing universe of tokens, NFTs and DAOs, climate-related crypto assets are already a reality. Put into a simple, utopian formula, the concept sounds like magic: invest in carbon, the price goes up, pollution stops. The Kyoto Protocol which attempted the concept between 2005-2020 under a top-down, inter-governmental UN framework, did not have the many merits of distributed ledger technology. Public awareness of climate catastrophe was much lower 20 years ago. Implementation is hard though, and some projects that built in overambitious yield promises or other inflationary features or design flaws have fared badly. Doing things the Cardano way sets our project apart through rigorous research and inclusion of a wider group of stakeholders. So this is the right time, and Cardano is the right blockchain to do this right.
Long description of the Solution
Building a vibrant, liquid carbon market the Cardano Way
- hybrid model of centralized/decentralized exchange offering both stability by proper collateralization, customer onboarding and governance while maintaining a design that allows for later transition to a fully decentralized, autonomous organization/exchange similar to “IOG Voltaire process”
- launch of a basic carbon building block asset and later a single carbon derivative to encourage trading, market making and draw liquidity
- allowing other carbon pools to list once they have sufficient size and can be modeled sufficiently to provide liquidity algorithmically
The Challenge setting explicitly mentions how Cardano sets itself apart through its rigorous research and strives to do things correctly. It is hopefully clear from our proposed solution and the approach taken with the BlockCarbon foundation and standard that we thrive to take an inclusive, rigorous approach and create a carbon market that is distinct from yield-seeking, speculative DeFi and instead focused on fundamental price discovery and long-term appreciation of emission costs. We are targeting the highest possible levels of certification. This would allow a completely new and uncorrelated asset class with enormous growth potential over decades to emerge and critically to get built on Cardano - attracting new users and diversifying the user-base and helping grow adoptions among many corporate and individual users currently not on the blockchain.
Proof-of-Work blockchains have created much controversy among climate activists using blockchain technology and it is important to build momentum on Cardano with all its benefits over Ethereum to address the challenge.
<u>https://www.ecowatch.com/wwf-nft-controversy-climate-impact.html</u>
Major risk of the proposal and mitigation measures:
-
Lack of progress, falling behind competing protocols: many projects fail as funds are depleted or others get to the users first. As the timeline for fighting climate change is measured in decades, and equally blockchain adoption is completely transforming financial services, we are relatively early to address the need for carbon as the building block for a new form of regenerative economy. As the Kyoto Protocol of the UN has shown, even successful and large schemes can underwhelm the expectations the world has of a lasting, fair and transparent solution to this most pressing issue of our lifetime.
-
Geopolitical events and adverse business environment: compared to the previous Catalyst funds, the war in Ukraine, the disappointing economic recovery after Covid and mounting inflationary pressures present a much gloomier business outlook. The prices of many crypto currencies and NFT projects have fallen over half in value. National carbon markets have seen large volatility since the beginning of the year after rising for over a year.
-
Negative Crypto Publicity and Declining ADA price: convincing carbon market users to move their precious offsets onto the Cardano blockchain will require a lot of trust, and many users have negative perception due to the 2017/2018 market volatility, early scams and unsustainable DeFi yield promises on the internet. We plan to focus early on the stability, energy-efficiency and long-term vision of Cardano Foundation, IOHK and the certification coming to Cardano DApps.
-
Regulation and missing Crypto-Legacy Finance Bridges: the 2017 ICO boom and following bust has made financial market regulators aware of tokens traded on the blockchain as potential securities and a risk for retail investors under their jurisdiction. To allow for easy and universal access, cooperation with existing DeFi marketplaces on Cardano will be necessary initially. This space is evolving very quickly and we foresee a much broader universe of existing DEXes and increasing ease of listing for ADA-linked tokens. However, to mitigate the risk of adverse development, we will develop in parallel the ability to initially mint NFTs from individual carbon offset projects and build functionality to trade or surrender these against (divisible) fractional ownership of the same project and/or ADA.
-
High Costs of building an Exchange and supporting Infrastructure: this risk does not immediately concern the project but the future prospects of growth into a dedicated trading marketplace, which is an important upside potential of the proposal. We plan to raise additional funds and donations early into the fulfilment period to this end, and will participate in open source DeFi communities to gain early access and build ahead of time to mitigate rising costs for talent, and infrastructure. The recently announced certification of Cardano DApps will further help draw funds into the project and gain critical mass for market making, dedicated developer support and cooperation with stake pool operators. <https://iohk.io/en/blog/posts/2021/10/25/new-certification-levels-for-smart-contracts-on- cardano/>